JPUS vs. NRSH
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - JPUS tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, JPUS returned 20.73% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
JPUS vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPUS vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 11.55% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 5.50% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and NRSH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between JPUS and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPUS vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPUS
NRSH
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
JPUS
NRSH
Healthcare
JPUS
NRSH
-
Consumer Defensive
JPUS
NRSH
-
Real Estate
JPUS
NRSH
Industrials
JPUS
NRSH
Utilities
JPUS
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
JPUS
NRSH
-
Financial Services
JPUS
NRSH
-
Energy
JPUS
NRSH
Basic Materials
JPUS
NRSH
-
Communication Services
JPUS
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
NRSH
JPUS vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPUS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.40 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 16.86 | -4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPUS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.42 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.11 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -24.01% | -14.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -10.94% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -5.62% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 3.50% | -1.78% |
Volatility
JPUS vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.90%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 9.21% | -6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 20.27% | -12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 24.44% | -14.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 21.54% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 21.54% | -4.78% |
JPUS vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPUS vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and NRSH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to JPUS (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 20.73% for JPUS. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer