JPSV vs. BSVO
JPSV (Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPSV returned 11.47%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for BSVO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPSV charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
JPSV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSV achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.
JPSV
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSVO
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPSV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 10.39% | 0.63% | 8.73% | 17.45% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 18.09% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSV and BSVO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between JPSV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPSV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSV
BSVO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
JPSV
BSVO
Industrials
JPSV
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
JPSV
BSVO
Technology
JPSV
BSVO
Real Estate
JPSV
BSVO
Communication Services
JPSV
BSVO
Utilities
JPSV
BSVO
-
Energy
JPSV
BSVO
Healthcare
JPSV
BSVO
Basic Materials
JPSV
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
JPSV
BSVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
JPSV
BSVO
JPSV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.99 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 14.22 | -9.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.21 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.78 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
JPSV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSV drawdown since its inception was -22.78%, smaller than the maximum BSVO drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSV and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -28.67% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.31% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.78% | -28.67% | +5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.86% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -5.73% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.91% | +0.45% |
Volatility
JPSV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) is 3.80%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that JPSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 4.77% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 11.95% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 18.88% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 21.72% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 21.72% | -3.80% |
JPSV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSV has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
JPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, which matches BSVO's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% |
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, JPSV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to JPSV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSV dropped -22.78% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 18.56% vs 11.47% for JPSV. On fees, BSVO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, JPSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSVO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JPSV.
JPSV and BSVO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.28%.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JPSV and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPSV and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer