PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPST vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPST vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 15.84% return.


JPST

1D
0.06%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.62%
YTD
2.01%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.99%

JQUA

1D
0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
13.59%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$283.32M$279.21M$317.05M
$27.54M$28.89M$36.27M

JPST vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
2.01%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.13%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
15.84%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JPST and JQUA is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.09

The correlation between JPST and JQUA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPST vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPST vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSTJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.51

1.34

+2.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

26.75

3.27

+23.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

126.55

13.35

+113.20

JPST vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPST Sharpe Ratio is 7.71, which is higher than the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPST and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPST vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSTJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-32.92%

+29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-7.13%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-16.81%

+16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

-22.47%

+21.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-4.10%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.74%

-1.71%

Volatility

JPST vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.14%, while JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSTJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

2.46%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

9.45%

-9.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52%

12.01%

-11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

15.73%

-15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

17.92%

-16.99%

JPST vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPST vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.20%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPST and JQUA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQUA has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to JPST (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.98% vs 3.72% for JPST. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.

JPST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while JQUA is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.12% for JQUA.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.71 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPST and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer