PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPST vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPST vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 2.47% return.


JPST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.99%

FLOT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.29%
6M
2.11%
YTD
2.47%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.07%
ALL TIME*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$94.03M$97.06M$92.58M
$275.20M$274.89M$316.70M

JPST vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.95%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.98%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.47%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between JPST and FLOT is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPST vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPST vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSTFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.60

3.02

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.70

10.73

+16.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

131.07

98.80

+32.27

JPST vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPST Sharpe Ratio is 7.56, which is comparable to the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPST and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPST vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum FLOT drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and FLOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSTFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-13.54%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-0.43%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-1.57%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

-2.36%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.21%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.05%

-0.02%

Volatility

JPST vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.13%, while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a volatility of 0.19%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSTFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.19%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

0.65%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55%

0.76%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

1.78%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

4.15%

-3.22%

JPST vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPST vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than FLOT's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.46%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.22%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPST and FLOT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOT has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to JPST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 5-year performance, FLOT leads with 4.31% vs 3.71% for JPST. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 4.31% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 4.22% for JPST.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.15% for FLOT.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.56 vs 6.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPST and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer