PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPST vs. BWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPST vs. BWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BWX's -1.42% return.


JPST

1D
0.06%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*

BWX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
-2.80%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-4.15%
10Y*
-1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPST vs. BWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.56%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.98%
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
-1.42%7.67%-5.93%5.10%-19.72%-8.67%9.50%5.58%-1.85%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between JPST and BWX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.30

The correlation between JPST and BWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPST vs. BWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BWX
BWX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPST vs. BWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSTBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+18.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.00

0.95

+3.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.30

-0.46

+29.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

143.82

-0.90

+144.72

JPST vs. BWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPST Sharpe Ratio is 8.18, which is higher than the BWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPST and BWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPST vs. BWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum BWX drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and BWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSTBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-34.05%

+30.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-6.16%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-10.22%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

-30.78%

+29.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.60%

+23.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-10.07%

+9.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

3.13%

-3.10%

Volatility

JPST vs. BWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.16%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSTBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.16%

2.49%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

5.92%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

7.66%

-7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

9.70%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

8.67%

-7.74%

JPST vs. BWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPST vs. BWX - Dividend Comparison

JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than BWX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
2.36%2.19%1.99%1.63%1.23%0.93%0.95%1.16%1.07%0.46%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.25%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPST and BWX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to JPST (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs BWX's -34.05%.

On 5-year performance, JPST leads with 3.64% vs -4.15% for BWX. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPST has performed better with a 3.64% return vs -4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BWX.

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 2.36% for BWX.

JPST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BWX is International Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.35% for BWX.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.18 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPST and BWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer