JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L
JPSR.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) and SJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from UBS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPSR.L returned 8.71%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for SJPA.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPSR.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SJPA.L.
Performance
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSR.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than SJPA.L's 16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, JPSR.L has underperformed SJPA.L with an annualized return of 8.71%, while SJPA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.
JPSR.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
SJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 33.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 11.27% | 18.27% | 8.64% | 7.70% | -9.85% | -3.37% | 16.62% | 21.49% | -11.09% | 10.04% |
SJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.31% | 18.19% | 8.36% | 12.76% | -6.21% | 1.62% | 11.03% | 14.68% | -9.15% | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSR.L and SJPA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JPSR.L and SJPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Industrials
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Financial Services
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Communication Services
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Healthcare
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Real Estate
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Consumer Defensive
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Basic Materials
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
Energy
JPSR.L
-
SJPA.L
Utilities
JPSR.L
-
SJPA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPSR.L
SJPA.L
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSR.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.15 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 10.28 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSR.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.92 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.65 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.64 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.57 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSR.L drawdown since its inception was -23.05%, smaller than the maximum SJPA.L drawdown of -24.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSR.L and SJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSR.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.05% | -24.73% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -10.71% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.83% | -13.45% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.57% | -18.93% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.05% | -24.73% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.10% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -6.68% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.29% | +0.02% |
Volatility
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSR.L | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.82% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.41% | 14.40% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 17.60% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 15.35% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 15.69% | +2.01% |
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSR.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SJPA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JPSR.L vs. SJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
JPSR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while SJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 1.03% | 1.74% | 1.67% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.42% | 1.16% |
SJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPSR.L and SJPA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for JPSR.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for JPSR.L and 0.15% for SJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for JPSR.L and SJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer