JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L
JPSR.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) and IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - JPSR.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPSR.L returned 8.71%/yr vs 14.77%/yr for IJPH.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPSR.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPH.L.
Performance
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JPSR.L is traded in GBp, while IJPH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IJPH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSR.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 19.91% return. Over the past 10 years, JPSR.L has underperformed IJPH.L with an annualized return of 8.71%, while IJPH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.
JPSR.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 6M
- 21.68%
- 1Y
- 52.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 11.27% | 18.27% | 8.64% | 7.70% | -9.85% | -3.37% | 16.62% | 21.49% | -11.09% | 10.04% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 19.91% | 29.38% | 23.82% | 34.19% | -4.30% | 11.94% | 9.27% | 15.95% | -15.90% | 19.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSR.L and IJPH.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between JPSR.L and IJPH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Industrials
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Financial Services
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Communication Services
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Healthcare
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Real Estate
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Defensive
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Basic Materials
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
Energy
JPSR.L
-
IJPH.L
Utilities
JPSR.L
-
IJPH.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPSR.L
IJPH.L
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSR.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 5.41 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 19.27 | -10.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSR.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.62 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.07 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.77 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.73 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSR.L drawdown since its inception was -23.05%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSR.L and IJPH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSR.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.05% | -34.55% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -9.64% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.83% | -21.95% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.57% | -21.95% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.05% | -34.55% | +11.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.37% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -7.42% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 2.71% | +0.60% |
Volatility
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that JPSR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJPH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSR.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.51% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.41% | 15.39% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 19.98% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 19.01% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 19.24% | -1.54% |
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSR.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSR.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison
JPSR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while IJPH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 1.03% | 1.74% | 1.67% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.42% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPSR.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPSR.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPSR.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
JPSR.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for JPSR.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.
Find the right allocation for JPSR.L and IJPH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer