PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSC.DE achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly lower than ETLZ.DE's 21.33% return.


JPSC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
6M
13.97%
YTD
19.98%
1Y
30.94%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
10Y*

ETLZ.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.72%
6M
15.70%
YTD
21.33%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JPSC.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
19.98%0.02%20.04%16.16%-14.43%
ETLZ.DE
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc
21.33%0.32%15.12%16.03%-13.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSC.DE and ETLZ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022

0.96

The correlation between JPSC.DE and ETLZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSC.DE
JPSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JPSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ETLZ.DE
ETLZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ETLZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSC.DEETLZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

5.33

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

15.94

-1.40

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the ETLZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSC.DE and ETLZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum ETLZ.DE drawdown of -58.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSC.DE and ETLZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSC.DEETLZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-58.36%

+27.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-7.04%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-31.34%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-2.30%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-10.71%

+2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.35%

-0.21%

Volatility

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSC.DEETLZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.22%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

11.22%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

16.57%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

19.97%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

21.00%

-2.14%

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSC.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLZ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPSC.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPSC.DE nor ETLZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JPSC.DE and ETLZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JPSC.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETLZ.DE.

JPSC.DE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure, while ETLZ.DE tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for JPSC.DE and 0.30% for ETLZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSC.DE and ETLZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer