JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L).
JPSC.DE and XLYP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JPSC.DE is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure. It was launched on Aug 16, 2022. XLYP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both JPSC.DE and XLYP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSC.DE JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 2.85% | 0.02% | 20.04% | 16.16% | -14.38% |
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF | -6.56% | -5.00% | 36.97% | 35.11% | -24.78% |
Different Trading Currencies
JPSC.DE is traded in EUR, while XLYP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLYP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSC.DE achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than XLYP.L's -6.56% return.
JPSC.DE
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLYP.L
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -6.48%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JPSC.DE and XLYP.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPSC.DE
XLYP.L
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSC.DE | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.22 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 0.45 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.06 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.28 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 0.83 | +4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSC.DE | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.22 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.67 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSC.DE and XLYP.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPSC.DE nor XLYP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum XLYP.L drawdown of -37.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSC.DE and XLYP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSC.DE | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.63% | -30.40% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | -12.73% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.98% | -10.73% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -6.53% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.00% | -1.36% |
Volatility
JPSC.DE vs. XLYP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) is 5.27%, while Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that JPSC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLYP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JPSC.DE | XLYP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 6.19% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 11.62% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.25% | 21.39% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 21.00% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 20.39% | -1.26% |