PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSC.DE achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than BBLL.DE's 2.66% return.


JPSC.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
4.19%
YTD
16.44%
6M
16.38%
1Y
31.93%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
10Y*

BBLL.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.06%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
1.85%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JPSC.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
16.44%0.02%20.04%16.16%-14.38%
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.66%-7.37%11.29%1.32%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSC.DE and BBLL.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSC.DE
JPSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JPSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.DE
BBLL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPSC.DEBBLL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.06

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

0.62

+4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.78

1.30

+13.48

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSC.DE and BBLL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPSC.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.34

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.29

+0.18

Drawdowns

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, which is greater than BBLL.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSC.DE and BBLL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSC.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-13.03%

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-3.38%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-11.65%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.22%

+7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-6.14%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.61%

+0.54%

Volatility

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPSC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) at 1.28%. This indicates that JPSC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSC.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

1.28%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

4.12%

+6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

6.07%

+9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

7.46%

+11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

7.22%

+11.71%

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSC.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLL.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPSC.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPSC.DE nor BBLL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPSC.DE and BBLL.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBLL.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBLL.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for JPSC.DE.

JPSC.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BBLL.DE is Government Bonds. JPSC.DE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure, while BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for JPSC.DE and 0.07% for BBLL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSC.DE and BBLL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer