JPO vs. UPAR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JPO (YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF) and UPAR (UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Tidal, while UPAR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the NONE. JPO is actively managed, while UPAR is passively managed. Over the past year, JPO returned 19.08% vs 15.74% for UPAR. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JPO charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UPAR.

Performance

JPO vs. UPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPO achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than UPAR's 3.37% return.

JPO

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 5.47%
• 6M: 14.60%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.53%

UPAR

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -2.83%
• 6M: -2.26%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 8.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	$418.56K	$404.33K	$336.84K
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF	$78.06K	$57.40K	$209.69K

JPO vs. UPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	8.98%	22.26%	13.97%	4.90%
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF	3.37%	23.87%	-2.26%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JPO and UPAR is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023	0.26

Return for Risk

JPO vs. UPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPO

JPO Risk / Return Rank: 34
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

UPAR

UPAR Risk / Return Rank: 42
UPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
UPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
UPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
UPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
UPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPO vs. UPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPO	UPAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.14	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.57	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.21	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	1.46	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	3.61	-0.61

JPO vs. UPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the UPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and UPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPO vs. UPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, smaller than the maximum UPAR drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and UPAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPO	UPAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.80%	-39.54%	+14.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.24%	-11.13%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-9.76%	+8.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-21.91%	+17.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.72%	4.51%	+1.21%

Volatility

JPO vs. UPAR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) at 3.57%. This indicates that JPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPO	UPAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	3.57%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.08%	12.30%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.41%	14.31%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	17.97%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	17.97%	+1.09%

JPO vs. UPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than UPAR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPO vs. UPAR - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.81%, more than UPAR's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	31.81%	34.13%	25.15%	4.84%	0.00%
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF	3.41%	3.28%	3.32%	3.04%	4.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPO and UPAR in my portfolio?

JPO and UPAR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPO or UPAR?

JPO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to UPAR (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPO dropped -24.80% vs UPAR's -39.54%.

Which ETF is better, JPO or UPAR?

On 1-year performance, JPO leads with 19.08% vs 15.74% for UPAR. On fees, UPAR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPO or UPAR?

Over the 1-year period, JPO has performed better with a 19.08% return vs 15.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPO or UPAR?

UPAR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPO or UPAR?

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 3.41% for UPAR.

What is the main difference between JPO and UPAR?

JPO is categorized as Options Trading, while UPAR is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for JPO and 0.65% for UPAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.