JPO vs. EOCT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT).

JPO and EOCT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JPO is an actively managed fund by Tidal. It was launched on Sep 12, 2023. EOCT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021.

Performance

JPO vs. EOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JPO vs. EOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	-7.93%	22.26%	13.97%	5.08%
EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October	0.91%	22.03%	9.66%	1.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPO achieves a -7.93% return, which is significantly lower than EOCT's 0.91% return.

JPO

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: -7.93%
• 6M: -6.79%
• 1Y: 13.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EOCT

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 19.93%
• 3Y*: 11.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPO vs. EOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EOCT's 0.89% expense ratio.

JPO

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF

EOCT

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October

Return for Risk

JPO vs. EOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPO

JPO Risk / Return Rank: 34
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

EOCT

EOCT Risk / Return Rank: 90
EOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPO vs. EOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JPO	EOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	1.91	-1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	2.67	-1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.39	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	3.04	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	12.67	-9.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JPO vs. EOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the EOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and EOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JPO	EOCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	1.91	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.49	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between JPO and EOCT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

JPO vs. EOCT - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, while EOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	33.69%	34.13%	25.15%	4.84%
EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JPO vs. EOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, which is greater than EOCT's maximum drawdown of -20.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and EOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPO	EOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.80%	-20.35%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.24%	-6.57%	-7.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.63%	-4.23%	-6.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-5.88%	+1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	1.58%	+3.64%

Volatility

JPO vs. EOCT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) at 4.79%. This indicates that JPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPO	EOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	4.79%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	6.68%	+8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.86%	10.48%	+11.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.11%	11.41%	+7.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.11%	11.41%	+7.70%