JPME vs. LSAF
JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and LSAF (LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - JPME tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index while LSAF tracks the AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPME returned 9.16%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for LSAF. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LSAF.
Performance
JPME vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than LSAF's 19.96% return.
JPME
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.44%
LSAF
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 30.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $970.37K | $1.56M | $1.48M | |
| $265.84K | $205.64K | $201.86K |
JPME vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.67% | 8.26% | 13.55% | 11.28% | -10.12% | 28.90% | 8.46% | 25.87% | -14.44% |
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF | 19.96% | 12.01% | 18.09% | 15.48% | -13.12% | 22.75% | 6.92% | 28.35% | -15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPME and LSAF is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between JPME and LSAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPME vs. LSAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPME
LSAF
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
JPME
LSAF
Real Estate
JPME
LSAF
Utilities
JPME
LSAF
Consumer Defensive
JPME
LSAF
Industrials
JPME
LSAF
Technology
JPME
LSAF
Financial Services
JPME
LSAF
Consumer Cyclical
JPME
LSAF
Basic Materials
JPME
LSAF
Energy
JPME
LSAF
Communication Services
JPME
LSAF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPME vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank
JPME
LSAF
JPME vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPME | LSAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 4.41 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 14.86 | -1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPME vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, roughly equal to the maximum LSAF drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and LSAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPME | LSAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -41.67% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -6.58% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -20.26% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -24.94% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.48% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -6.21% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.95% | -0.17% |
Volatility
JPME vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) is 2.67%, while LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that JPME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPME | LSAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 4.21% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 10.49% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 14.36% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 18.38% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 21.73% | -4.10% |
JPME vs. LSAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPME vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison
JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than LSAF's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.74% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% |
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.42% | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.71% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPME and LSAF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSAF has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to JPME (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs LSAF's -41.67%.
On 5-year performance, LSAF leads with 10.90% vs 9.16% for JPME. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LSAF has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LSAF.
JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.57% for LSAF.
JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index, while LSAF tracks AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.75% for LSAF.
LSAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPME and LSAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer