JPME vs. CTEF
JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. JPME is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
JPME vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.88% return.
JPME
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
CTEF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 29.88%
- 6M
- 31.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPME vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 13.26% | 8.26% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.88% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPME and CTEF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPME vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
JPME
CTEF
JPME vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPME | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPME | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 3.59 | -2.95 |
Drawdowns
JPME vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPME | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -15.00% | -26.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -1.80% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility
JPME vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPME | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 21.84% | -9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 21.84% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 21.84% | -4.14% |
JPME vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPME vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.82% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPME and CTEF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for JPME and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer