JPME vs. BMVP
JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - JPME tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPME returned 11.02%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for BMVP. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.
Performance
JPME vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, JPME has outperformed BMVP with an annualized return of 11.02%, while BMVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.
JPME
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.44%
BMVP
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 14.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $49.65K | $64.59K | $60.35K | |
| $970.37K | $1.56M | $1.48M |
JPME vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.67% | 8.26% | 13.55% | 11.28% | -10.12% | 28.90% | 8.46% | 25.87% | -8.92% | 19.09% |
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 10.39% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPME and BMVP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JPME and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPME vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPME
BMVP
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
JPME
BMVP
Real Estate
JPME
BMVP
Utilities
JPME
BMVP
Consumer Defensive
JPME
BMVP
Industrials
JPME
BMVP
Technology
JPME
BMVP
Financial Services
JPME
BMVP
Consumer Cyclical
JPME
BMVP
Basic Materials
JPME
BMVP
Energy
JPME
BMVP
Communication Services
JPME
BMVP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPME vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank
JPME
BMVP
JPME vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPME | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.15 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 6.44 | +6.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPME vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and BMVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPME | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -78.13% | +37.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -6.45% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -15.12% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -26.58% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | -39.45% | -1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.56% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -35.96% | +31.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.15% | -0.37% |
Volatility
JPME vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) is 2.67%, while Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that JPME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPME | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 3.43% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 7.30% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 9.97% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 15.90% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 18.73% | -1.10% |
JPME vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPME vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison
JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than BMVP's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.72% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.74% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPME and BMVP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMVP has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to JPME (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs BMVP's -78.13%.
On 10-year performance, JPME leads with 11.02% vs 9.67% for BMVP. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JPME has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.
JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.72% for BMVP.
JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.29% for BMVP.
JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPME and BMVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer