JPM vs. AAAU
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) is a stock, while AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Over the past 5 years, JPM returned 17.82%/yr vs 17.33%/yr for AAAU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
JPM vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's -2.40% return.
JPM
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 34.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.02%
AAAU
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -7.36%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- —
JPM vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 0.50% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -14.26% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -2.40% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 12.96% | -0.50% | -4.01% | 25.02% | 18.17% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPM and AAAU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2018 | -0.02 |
The correlation between JPM and AAAU shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPM vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
JPM
AAAU
JPM vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPM | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 0.99 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.36 | 2.86 | +0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPM vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -24.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPM | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -24.38% | -51.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -24.38% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.42% | -24.38% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | -24.38% | -14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -21.95% | +18.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -6.23% | -11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 8.44% | -1.90% |
Volatility
JPM vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is 6.35%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that JPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPM | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 7.77% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 23.88% | -7.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 27.10% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 18.06% | +6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.39% | 17.13% | +10.26% |
Dividends
JPM vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.84% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPM and AAAU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAAU has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to JPM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPM dropped -76.16% vs AAAU's -24.38%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPM and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer