PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPLG.L is traded in GBp, while WMVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WMVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPLG.L achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than WMVG.L's 1.22% return.


JPLG.L

1D
0.68%
1M
3.55%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.53%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*

WMVG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.94%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.76%10.11%12.09%7.05%0.72%24.67%2.57%-0.56%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
1.22%9.08%14.49%7.33%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JPLG.L and WMVG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.73

The correlation between JPLG.L and WMVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPLG.L
WMVG.L

Healthcare

12.2%
13.8%

Financial Services

11.3%
14.0%

Technology

10.7%
20.1%

Industrials

10.5%
9.2%

Utilities

9.3%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
10.9%

Energy

8.4%
4.5%

Basic Materials

8.1%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.6%

Real Estate

7.5%
0.7%

Communication Services

5.8%
12.1%

Healthcare

JPLG.L
12.2%
WMVG.L
13.8%

Financial Services

JPLG.L
11.3%
WMVG.L
14.0%

Technology

JPLG.L
10.7%
WMVG.L
20.1%

Industrials

JPLG.L
10.5%
WMVG.L
9.2%

Utilities

JPLG.L
9.3%
WMVG.L
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

JPLG.L
8.4%
WMVG.L
10.9%

Energy

JPLG.L
8.4%
WMVG.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

JPLG.L
8.1%
WMVG.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JPLG.L
7.9%
WMVG.L
5.6%

Real Estate

JPLG.L
7.5%
WMVG.L
0.7%

Communication Services

JPLG.L
5.8%
WMVG.L
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPLG.LWMVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.07

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

0.57

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

1.42

+13.94

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLG.L and WMVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPLG.LWMVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

0.39

+2.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.62

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Drawdowns

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, roughly equal to the maximum WMVG.L drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLG.L and WMVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPLG.LWMVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.53%

-28.25%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-4.99%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

-9.09%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.65%

-15.18%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.30%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-4.12%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.00%

-0.50%

Volatility

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) is 1.96%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that JPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPLG.LWMVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

2.29%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

5.05%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

7.21%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

9.95%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

12.14%

+1.61%

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WMVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPLG.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPLG.L nor WMVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPLG.L and WMVG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.

JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JPLG.L and 0.35% for WMVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPLG.L and WMVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer