JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L
JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) and VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - JPLG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VWRA.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPLG.L returned 10.40%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for VWRA.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPLG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRA.L.
Performance
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JPLG.L is traded in GBp, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPLG.L achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 12.10% return.
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 23.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 30.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.76% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 2.57% | -0.83% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.10% | 13.73% | 19.70% | 16.17% | -8.37% | 19.58% | 12.78% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPLG.L and VWRA.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JPLG.L and VWRA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Financial Services
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Technology
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Industrials
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Utilities
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Energy
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Basic Materials
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Real Estate
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Communication Services
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPLG.L
VWRA.L
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPLG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.48 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 4.36 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.36 | 16.79 | -1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPLG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.55 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.89 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLG.L and VWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPLG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.53% | -25.64% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -6.93% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | -18.10% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.65% | -18.10% | +4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.40% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -3.46% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.80% | -0.30% |
Volatility
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) is 1.96%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that JPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPLG.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 3.77% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | 9.25% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | 11.86% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 14.06% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 16.05% | -2.30% |
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JPLG.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPLG.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPLG.L and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JPLG.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for JPLG.L and VWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer