JPLG.L vs. BATG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPLG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPLG.L returned 10.40%/yr vs 17.96%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPLG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.

Performance

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPLG.L achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 37.63% return.

JPLG.L

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 10.76%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 23.08%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

BATG.L

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 37.63%
• 6M: 44.30%
• 1Y: 135.61%
• 3Y*: 26.06%
• 5Y*: 17.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating	10.76%	10.11%	12.09%	7.05%	0.72%	24.67%	2.57%	-0.56%
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	37.63%	60.42%	0.47%	2.83%	-3.91%	17.00%	75.38%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JPLG.L and BATG.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between JPLG.L and BATG.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPLG.L	BATG.L
Healthcare	12.2%	-
Financial Services	11.3%	-
Technology	10.7%	17.6%
Industrials	10.5%	31.2%
Utilities	9.3%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	-
Energy	8.4%	-
Basic Materials	8.1%	24.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	20.1%
Real Estate	7.5%	-
Communication Services	5.8%	-

Return for Risk

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPLG.L

JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BATG.L

BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JPLG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	4.86	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	5.16	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.70	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	9.91	-5.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	34.05	-18.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is lower than the BATG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLG.L and BATG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JPLG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	4.86	-1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	0.80	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.82	-0.12

Drawdowns

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, smaller than the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLG.L and BATG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPLG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.53%	-33.37%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-13.61%	+8.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.65%	-33.37%	+19.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.65%	-33.37%	+19.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.75%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-8.99%	+5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	3.97%	-2.47%

Volatility

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) is 1.96%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that JPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPLG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	9.84%	-7.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.88%	21.92%	-16.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.88%	27.78%	-19.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.90%	22.51%	-11.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	22.84%	-9.09%

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPLG.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPLG.L nor BATG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPLG.L and BATG.L in my portfolio?

JPLG.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JPLG.L or BATG.L?

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPLG.L or BATG.L?

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.

What is the main difference between JPLG.L and BATG.L?

JPLG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JPLG.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.