JPLD vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JPLD (JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JPLD returned 4.19% vs 18.72% for FFUT. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. JPLD charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

JPLD vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPLD achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 8.83% return.

JPLD

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPLD vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	1.08%	3.45%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	8.83%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between JPLD and FFUT is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.30

Return for Risk

JPLD vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPLD

JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPLD vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPLD	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	1.68	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.38	2.40	+1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.32	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	4.35	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.07	14.55	+4.52

JPLD vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLD and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPLD vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLD drawdown since its inception was -1.17%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLD and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPLD	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.17%	-4.33%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.00%	-4.33%	+3.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-4.33%	+4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.15%	-0.96%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.22%	1.29%	-1.07%

Volatility

JPLD vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that JPLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPLD	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	2.93%	-2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.05%	8.97%	-7.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48%	11.22%	-9.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.84%	11.02%	-9.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.84%	11.02%	-9.18%

JPLD vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLD has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPLD vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

JPLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FFUT's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.92%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	4.21%	4.24%	4.47%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPLD and FFUT in my portfolio?

JPLD and FFUT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPLD or FFUT?

FFUT has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to JPLD (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPLD dropped -1.17% vs FFUT's -4.33%.

Which ETF is better, JPLD or FFUT?

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.72% vs 4.19% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPLD or FFUT?

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPLD or FFUT?

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPLD or FFUT?

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.92% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between JPLD and FFUT?

JPLD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPLD and 0.80% for FFUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.