PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPJP.L is traded in GBP, while MXJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPJP.L having a 16.36% return and MXJP.L slightly higher at 16.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPJP.L having a 10.23% annualized return and MXJP.L not far behind at 10.19%.


JPJP.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
6.24%
YTD
16.36%
6M
15.47%
1Y
34.12%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
10.23%

MXJP.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
6.15%
YTD
16.68%
6M
15.34%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPJP.L
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
16.36%17.50%9.02%13.95%-7.16%2.15%12.42%13.92%-8.48%13.12%
MXJP.L
Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
16.68%16.88%9.09%14.45%-7.26%1.70%12.81%13.62%-8.43%13.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JPJP.L and MXJP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.93

The correlation between JPJP.L and MXJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPJP.L
MXJP.L

Industrials

26.0%
26.0%

Technology

19.1%
19.1%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
12.2%

Communication Services

7.9%
7.9%

Healthcare

6.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.3%

Utilities

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

1.1%
1.1%

Industrials

JPJP.L
26.0%
MXJP.L
26.0%

Technology

JPJP.L
19.1%
MXJP.L
19.1%

Financial Services

JPJP.L
17.5%
MXJP.L
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JPJP.L
12.1%
MXJP.L
12.2%

Communication Services

JPJP.L
7.9%
MXJP.L
7.9%

Healthcare

JPJP.L
6.3%
MXJP.L
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

JPJP.L
3.6%
MXJP.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

JPJP.L
3.0%
MXJP.L
3.0%

Real Estate

JPJP.L
2.3%
MXJP.L
2.3%

Utilities

JPJP.L
1.1%
MXJP.L
1.1%

Energy

JPJP.L
1.1%
MXJP.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPJP.L
JPJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JPJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MXJP.L
MXJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPJP.LMXJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.20

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.20

10.15

+0.06

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the MXJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPJP.L and MXJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPJP.LMXJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.74

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.60

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.60

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Drawdowns

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, roughly equal to the maximum MXJP.L drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPJP.L and MXJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPJP.LMXJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.23%

-25.46%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-10.56%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.21%

-13.90%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.57%

-18.56%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.23%

-25.46%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.49%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.08%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.33%

+0.01%

Volatility

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (MXJP.L) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPJP.LMXJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

4.22%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

15.90%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

19.45%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

16.79%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

17.01%

-1.07%

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MXJP.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPJP.L vs. MXJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPJP.L nor MXJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JPJP.L and MXJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JPJP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPJP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MXJP.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JPJP.L and 0.19% for MXJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPJP.L and MXJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer