PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPJP.L is traded in GBP, while CJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CJPU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPJP.L having a 12.46% return and CJPU.L slightly higher at 12.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPJP.L having a 8.74% annualized return and CJPU.L not far behind at 8.56%.


JPJP.L

1D
-2.10%
1M
-5.97%
6M
5.59%
YTD
12.46%
1Y
30.05%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
8.74%

CJPU.L

1D
-2.34%
1M
-6.86%
6M
5.58%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPJP.L
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
12.46%17.50%9.03%13.95%-7.16%2.15%12.42%13.92%-8.48%13.12%
CJPU.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.60%17.14%9.20%14.24%-7.49%1.45%12.67%13.16%-8.37%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JPJP.L and CJPU.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2015

0.86

The correlation between JPJP.L and CJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPJP.L
JPJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JPJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CJPU.L
CJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPJP.LCJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.84

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

8.61

-0.17

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPJP.L and CJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than CJPU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPJP.L and CJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-24.62%

-74.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-10.54%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.21%

-14.29%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.57%

-18.51%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.39%

-24.62%

-74.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.65%

-8.44%

-90.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.01%

-6.35%

-92.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.49%

+0.06%

Volatility

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) have volatilities of 6.65% and 6.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

6.83%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

17.53%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

20.79%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

17.07%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,446.36%

16.77%

+4,429.59%

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JPJP.L and CJPU.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPJP.L nor CJPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JPJP.L and CJPU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPJP.L and CJPU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

JPJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPJP.L and CJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer