PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPHY vs. SCYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPHY vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHY achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 1.55% return.


JPHY

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCYB

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHY vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPHY and SCYB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.83

JPHY vs. SCYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPHY
SCYB

Communication Services

15.8%
8.9%

Industrials

10.8%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.6%

Energy

7.0%
5.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
5.8%

Technology

4.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

3.0%
4.2%

Utilities

2.8%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

1.8%
4.9%

Communication Services

JPHY
15.8%
SCYB
8.9%

Industrials

JPHY
10.8%
SCYB
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JPHY
8.9%
SCYB
10.6%

Energy

JPHY
7.0%
SCYB
5.8%

Healthcare

JPHY
5.1%
SCYB
5.8%

Technology

JPHY
4.8%
SCYB
4.5%

Basic Materials

JPHY
3.6%
SCYB
3.5%

Real Estate

JPHY
3.0%
SCYB
4.2%

Utilities

JPHY
2.8%
SCYB
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

JPHY
2.4%
SCYB
2.5%

Financial Services

JPHY
1.8%
SCYB
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPHY vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHY

SCYB
SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHY vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JPHY vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPHYSCYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

1.68

+0.48

Drawdowns

JPHY vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHY drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHY and SCYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPHYSCYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-4.92%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.33%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.52%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

Volatility

JPHY vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPHYSCYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04%

3.76%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

5.13%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.04%

5.13%

-2.09%

JPHY vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHY has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPHY vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

JPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than SCYB's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JPHY
JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF
5.92%3.32%0.00%0.00%
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
6.94%6.99%7.06%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPHY and SCYB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPHY.

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 5.92% for JPHY.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPHY and 0.03% for SCYB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPHY and SCYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer