JPHY vs. FLRT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JPHY (JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JPHY returned 5.98% vs 5.11% for FLRT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPHY charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

JPHY vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHY achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.10% return.

JPHY

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 1.78%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 1Y: 5.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 1Y: 5.11%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 4.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHY vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF	2.22%	4.06%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	2.10%	3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JPHY and FLRT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

JPHY vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHY

JPHY Risk / Return Rank: 85
JPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
JPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
JPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 87
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHY vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPHY	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	3.49	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	5.24	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.78	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	2.89	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.80	10.60	+6.21

JPHY vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPHY and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPHY vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHY drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHY and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPHY	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-20.96%	+19.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.65%	-1.78%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.02%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-1.40%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	0.48%	-0.12%

Volatility

JPHY vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.30%. This indicates that JPHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPHY	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	0.30%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.33%	1.22%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00%	1.47%	+1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.97%	2.30%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.97%	6.11%	-3.14%

JPHY vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHY has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPHY vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

JPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than FLRT's 6.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.76%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF	6.48%	3.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPHY and FLRT in my portfolio?

JPHY and FLRT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPHY or FLRT?

JPHY has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to FLRT (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHY dropped -1.65% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which ETF is better, JPHY or FLRT?

On 1-year performance, JPHY leads with 5.98% vs 5.11% for FLRT. On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPHY or FLRT?

Over the 1-year period, JPHY has performed better with a 5.98% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPHY or FLRT?

JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPHY or FLRT?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 6.48% for JPHY.

What is the main difference between JPHY and FLRT?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPHY and 0.69% for FLRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.