PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPHSX vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHSX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, JPHSX has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 3.80%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.


JPHSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
3.80%

IEMG

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.97%
YTD
26.21%
6M
28.63%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
1.20%0.89%7.14%11.07%-2.13%4.57%1.28%7.15%-0.31%3.05%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.21%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JPHSX and IEMG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPHSX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHSX
JPHSX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JPHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JPHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPHSXIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.00

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

15.38

-8.24

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPHSX and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPHSXIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.72

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.72

0.41

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.52

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.35

+0.74

Drawdowns

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHSX drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHSX and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPHSXIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-38.71%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-13.21%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.10%

-17.21%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

-35.83%

+28.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.95%

-38.71%

+17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.34%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-12.97%

+11.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

3.43%

-2.97%

Volatility

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) is 0.34%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that JPHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPHSXIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

8.31%

-7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

16.93%

-15.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

19.43%

-17.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

18.38%

-16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

20.03%

-16.38%

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPHSX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

JPHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than IEMG's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.18%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
7.01%6.84%9.21%7.94%5.12%3.34%3.88%5.27%4.57%3.78%4.49%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPHSX and IEMG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to JPHSX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHSX dropped -20.95% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPHSX and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer