PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPHSX vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHSX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, JPHSX has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 3.80%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.


JPHSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
3.80%

BNDX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.23%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
1.20%0.89%7.14%11.07%-2.13%4.57%1.28%7.15%-0.31%3.05%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.54%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JPHSX and BNDX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPHSX vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHSX
JPHSX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JPHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JPHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPHSXBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.10

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

0.62

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

1.78

+5.36

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPHSX and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPHSXBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.53

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.72

0.07

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.41

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.61

+0.49

Drawdowns

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHSX drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHSX and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPHSXBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-16.23%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-2.93%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.10%

-2.93%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

-15.86%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.95%

-16.23%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.49%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-3.09%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.02%

-0.56%

Volatility

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) is 0.34%, while Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that JPHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPHSXBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

1.57%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

2.91%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

3.43%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

4.88%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

4.09%

-0.44%

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPHSX vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

JPHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than BNDX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.49%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
7.01%6.84%9.21%7.94%5.12%3.34%3.88%5.27%4.57%3.78%4.49%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPHSX and BNDX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNDX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to JPHSX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHSX dropped -20.95% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

JPHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPHSX and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer