PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPEM vs. JEMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPEM vs. JEMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPEM achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than JEMA's 30.19% return.


JPEM

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.61%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
7.80%

JEMA

1D
-0.93%
1M
5.94%
YTD
30.19%
6M
32.21%
1Y
59.34%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPEM vs. JEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
7.27%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%2.84%
JEMA
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
30.19%34.89%5.68%9.82%-24.98%-4.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JPEM and JEMA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021

0.87

The correlation between JPEM and JEMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPEM vs. JEMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPEM
JEMA

Financial Services

19.1%
21.2%

Industrials

13.1%
7.4%

Basic Materials

11.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.6%

Utilities

9.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
2.5%

Communication Services

8.4%
7.0%

Energy

7.5%
4.0%

Technology

6.7%
41.1%

Healthcare

4.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.6%

Financial Services

JPEM
19.1%
JEMA
21.2%

Industrials

JPEM
13.1%
JEMA
7.4%

Basic Materials

JPEM
11.3%
JEMA
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JPEM
10.0%
JEMA
9.6%

Utilities

JPEM
9.2%
JEMA
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

JPEM
8.6%
JEMA
2.5%

Communication Services

JPEM
8.4%
JEMA
7.0%

Energy

JPEM
7.5%
JEMA
4.0%

Technology

JPEM
6.7%
JEMA
41.1%

Healthcare

JPEM
4.3%
JEMA
1.7%

Real Estate

JPEM
1.8%
JEMA
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPEM vs. JEMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JEMA
JEMA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPEM vs. JEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPEMJEMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.53

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

4.55

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

18.62

-10.60

JPEM vs. JEMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the JEMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPEM and JEMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPEMJEMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.95

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

JPEM vs. JEMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPEM drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, roughly equal to the maximum JEMA drawdown of -39.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEM and JEMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPEMJEMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.22%

-39.50%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-13.11%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.30%

-18.11%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-39.45%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-2.02%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-17.03%

+7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.20%

-0.44%

Volatility

JPEM vs. JEMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) is 4.38%, while JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that JPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPEMJEMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

8.31%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

17.57%

-6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

20.23%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

19.02%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

18.90%

-1.86%

JPEM vs. JEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPEM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than JEMA's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPEM vs. JEMA - Dividend Comparison

JPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than JEMA's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMA
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.25%2.93%2.44%2.95%2.69%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.40%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPEM and JEMA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMA has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to JPEM (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPEM dropped -40.22% vs JEMA's -39.50%.

On 5-year performance, JEMA leads with 7.00% vs 6.05% for JPEM. On fees, JEMA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JEMA has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEMA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JPEM.

JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.25% for JEMA.

Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JPEM and 0.39% for JEMA.

JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPEM and JEMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer