JPEM vs. EMXC
JPEM (J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - JPEM tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPEM returned 6.05%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPEM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
JPEM vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPEM achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 39.90% return.
JPEM
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 45.10%
- 1Y
- 73.97%
- 3Y*
- 28.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
JPEM vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPEM J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 7.27% | 22.90% | 4.23% | 11.01% | -9.03% | 8.11% | -0.46% | 16.21% | -10.55% | 7.81% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 39.90% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPEM and EMXC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JPEM and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPEM vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPEM
EMXC
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
JPEM
EMXC
Industrials
JPEM
EMXC
Basic Materials
JPEM
EMXC
Consumer Cyclical
JPEM
EMXC
Utilities
JPEM
EMXC
Consumer Defensive
JPEM
EMXC
Communication Services
JPEM
EMXC
Energy
JPEM
EMXC
Technology
JPEM
EMXC
Healthcare
JPEM
EMXC
Real Estate
JPEM
EMXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPEM vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
JPEM
EMXC
JPEM vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 5.16 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 20.85 | -12.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 3.42 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.54 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
JPEM vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPEM drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEM and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.22% | -42.81% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -14.41% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.30% | -19.12% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.57% | -28.91% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -2.27% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -10.19% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.56% | -0.80% |
Volatility
JPEM vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) is 4.38%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that JPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPEM | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 9.83% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 19.41% | -8.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 21.75% | -8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 17.45% | -3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.82% | -2.78% |
JPEM vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPEM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPEM vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
JPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than EMXC's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.01% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPEM J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 4.40% | 4.65% | 5.12% | 4.46% | 4.71% | 4.40% | 2.85% | 3.47% | 2.79% | 2.14% | 1.28% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPEM and EMXC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to JPEM (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPEM dropped -40.22% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.47% vs 6.05% for JPEM. On fees, JPEM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPEM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.01% for EMXC.
JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JPEM and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPEM and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer