JPC vs. HPF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JPC (Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund) and HPF (John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, JPC returned 5.69%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for HPF. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPC charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for HPF.

Performance

JPC vs. HPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPC achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than HPF's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, JPC has outperformed HPF with an annualized return of 5.69%, while HPF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.

JPC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 7.53%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: 5.69%

HPF

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 2.93%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 10.83%
• 3Y*: 12.88%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 4.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPC vs. HPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JPC Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund	0.03%	14.00%	27.58%	0.75%	-19.18%	9.75%	-2.09%	35.25%	-12.70%	13.35%
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II	2.93%	6.34%	14.41%	10.78%	-18.44%	17.90%	-7.67%	27.95%	-5.38%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JPC and HPF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2003	0.48

The correlation between JPC and HPF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JPC vs. HPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPC

JPC Risk / Return Rank: 9
JPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
JPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
JPC Omega Ratio Rank: 10
JPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
JPC Martin Ratio Rank: 13

HPF

HPF Risk / Return Rank: 24
HPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
HPF Omega Ratio Rank: 27
HPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
HPF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPC vs. HPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPC	HPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	1.33	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	2.02	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	1.51	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	4.71	-1.26

JPC vs. HPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the HPF Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPC and HPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPC vs. HPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPC drawdown since its inception was -76.07%, which is greater than HPF's maximum drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPC and HPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPC	HPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.07%	-66.73%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-7.18%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.65%	-16.91%	+5.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.26%	-31.24%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.53%	-54.76%	+2.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-2.56%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.93%	-8.51%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.31%	-0.12%

Volatility

JPC vs. HPF - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPC	HPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	2.64%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	6.74%	+3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.33%	8.16%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	15.48%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.64%	22.08%	-1.44%

JPC vs. HPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPC has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is higher than HPF's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JPC vs. HPF - Dividend Comparison

JPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, more than HPF's 9.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II	9.39%	9.22%	8.95%	9.39%	9.45%	7.10%	7.80%	7.32%	8.96%	7.82%	8.30%	7.85%
JPC Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund	9.95%	9.79%	8.94%	8.00%	8.74%	6.52%	6.95%	7.00%	9.02%	7.50%	8.14%	8.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPC and HPF in my portfolio?

JPC and HPF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPC or HPF?

HPF has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to JPC (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPC dropped -76.07% vs HPF's -66.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.