PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOPPX vs. FZAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Opportunity Fund (JOPPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOPPX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, JOPPX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 9.10%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.


JOPPX

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
4.99%
6M
6.25%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
9.10%

FZAMX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.37%
YTD
19.86%
6M
22.36%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JOPPX
Johnson Opportunity Fund
4.99%4.13%3.97%17.12%-12.39%30.51%7.85%28.63%-14.16%16.95%
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
19.86%12.00%17.39%15.15%-14.70%25.40%18.84%23.85%-14.85%20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JOPPX and FZAMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.93

The correlation between JOPPX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOPPX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOPPX
JOPPX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
JOPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
JOPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAMX
FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Opportunity Fund (JOPPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOPPXFZAMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

2.23

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

3.06

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.39

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.85

-2.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.08

15.50

-11.42

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOPPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOPPX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOPPXFZAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.23

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.54

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.59

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.57

-0.29

Drawdowns

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOPPX drawdown since its inception was -71.27%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOPPX and FZAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOPPXFZAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.27%

-42.32%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-9.77%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-25.24%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-25.24%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.28%

-42.32%

+4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-0.71%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.48%

-6.08%

-8.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.43%

+0.65%

Volatility

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Opportunity Fund (JOPPX) is 3.53%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that JOPPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOPPXFZAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

4.83%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

13.69%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

17.13%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

20.22%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

20.94%

-1.73%

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOPPX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOPPX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

JOPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than FZAMX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z
5.88%10.09%6.93%2.83%5.86%18.58%1.41%3.50%10.72%7.81%5.00%4.90%
JOPPX
Johnson Opportunity Fund
4.67%4.90%0.00%3.67%4.36%13.04%0.57%4.36%6.75%10.55%2.03%9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOPPX and FZAMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAMX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to JOPPX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOPPX dropped -71.27% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOPPX and FZAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer