PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOBX vs. LRCU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOBX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF (JOBX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOBX achieves a -46.15% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 219.61% return.


JOBX

1D
-6.06%
1M
51.68%
YTD
-46.15%
6M
-63.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LRCU

1D
-4.57%
1M
43.52%
YTD
219.61%
6M
274.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOBX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JOBX
Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF
-46.15%-26.30%
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
219.61%140.01%

Correlation

The correlation between JOBX and LRCU is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOBX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF (JOBX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JOBX vs. LRCU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOBXLRCUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

12.64

-13.13

Drawdowns

JOBX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOBX drawdown since its inception was -88.29%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOBX and LRCU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOBXLRCUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.29%

-40.09%

-48.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.47%

-4.57%

-74.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-9.36%

-49.84%

Volatility

JOBX vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOBXLRCUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.45%

109.40%

+37.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.45%

109.40%

+37.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.45%

109.40%

+37.05%

JOBX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JOBX and LRCU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

JOBX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

Neither JOBX nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JOBX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JOBX and LRCU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

JOBX and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOBX and LRCU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer