JNVSX vs. GSMCX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) and GSMCX (Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JNVSX returned 11.17%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for GSMCX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNVSX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for GSMCX.

Performance

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNVSX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than GSMCX's 15.64% return. Over the past 10 years, JNVSX has underperformed GSMCX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while GSMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.

JNVSX

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 6M: -2.18%
• 1Y: -2.31%
• 3Y*: 4.99%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

GSMCX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.53%
• YTD: 15.64%
• 6M: 14.08%
• 1Y: 26.22%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund	-1.11%	-2.58%	9.40%	18.58%	-15.83%	60.71%	14.79%	27.58%	-9.03%	15.08%
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund	15.64%	9.77%	19.33%	11.95%	-10.25%	30.75%	8.78%	32.04%	-10.53%	11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JNVSX and GSMCX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010	0.89

The correlation between JNVSX and GSMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JNVSX vs. GSMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNVSX

JNVSX Risk / Return Rank: 2
JNVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
JNVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
JNVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
JNVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
JNVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GSMCX

GSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 57
GSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JNVSX	GSMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	1.71	-1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.28	2.45	-2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.30	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	2.75	-3.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	10.28	-10.87

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNVSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the GSMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNVSX and GSMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNVSX drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum GSMCX drawdown of -54.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVSX and GSMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNVSX	GSMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.52%	-54.35%	+19.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-9.17%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	-19.34%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.56%	-20.03%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.52%	-42.57%	+8.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.54%	-1.07%	-8.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-7.56%	+2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	2.44%	+3.12%

Volatility

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) is 3.47%, while Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that JNVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNVSX	GSMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	4.98%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	11.50%	-1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	14.75%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	18.00%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	20.51%	-1.28%

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNVSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GSMCX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNVSX vs. GSMCX - Dividend Comparison

JNVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.38%, less than GSMCX's 12.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund	12.67%	14.65%	13.86%	4.92%	13.96%	17.06%	0.69%	3.42%	18.39%	15.77%	1.49%	13.85%
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund	11.38%	11.31%	6.15%	0.56%	2.69%	22.40%	1.27%	5.13%	6.15%	4.14%	1.34%	17.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNVSX and GSMCX in my portfolio?

JNVSX and GSMCX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNVSX or GSMCX?

GSMCX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to JNVSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNVSX dropped -34.52% vs GSMCX's -54.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.