FHUMX vs. BEARX
FHUMX (Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund) and BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) are both mutual funds - FHUMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Federated, while BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, FHUMX returned 5.83%/yr vs -11.36%/yr for BEARX. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. FHUMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for BEARX.
Performance
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHUMX achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -7.39% return.
FHUMX
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- —
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 1Y
- -13.26%
- 3Y*
- -14.62%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- -14.30%
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 11.50% | -1.38% | 9.90% | 21.92% | -16.51% | 22.94% | 27.31% |
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -7.39% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -19.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHUMX and BEARX is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | -0.72 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FHUMX and BEARX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.72 to -0.37, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHUMX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank
FHUMX
BEARX
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHUMX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.82 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | -0.80 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | -1.61 | +4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHUMX drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHUMX and BEARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHUMX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -95.75% | +66.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -16.55% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | -44.46% | +14.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.48% | -52.48% | +23.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -95.65% | +90.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -61.15% | +53.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 8.27% | -4.38% |
Volatility
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) at 4.46%. This indicates that FHUMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHUMX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 4.46% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.83% | 10.22% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.55% | 12.51% | +9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.61% | 17.13% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 16.69% | +4.57% |
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHUMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHUMX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison
FHUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than BEARX's 7.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.25% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% |
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 7.67% | 8.56% | 0.93% | 4.41% | 2.77% | 4.05% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHUMX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHUMX has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to BEARX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHUMX dropped -29.48% vs BEARX's -95.75%.
FHUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHUMX and BEARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer