PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHUMX vs. BEARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHUMX achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -9.50% return.


FHUMX

1D
1.94%
1M
3.95%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.24%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*

BEARX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-9.50%
6M
-9.81%
1Y
-19.70%
3Y*
-16.79%
5Y*
-12.48%
10Y*
-14.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHUMX
Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund
11.99%-1.38%9.90%21.92%-16.51%22.94%27.31%
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
-9.50%-12.42%-20.34%-18.67%17.78%-23.78%-19.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FHUMX and BEARX is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2020

-0.72

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FHUMX and BEARX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.72 to -0.24, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHUMX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHUMX
FHUMX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FHUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FHUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BEARX
BEARX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHUMXBEARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.70

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

-1.00

+2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

-1.89

+6.53

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHUMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the BEARX Sharpe Ratio of -1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHUMX and BEARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHUMXBEARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

-1.75

+2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.74

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.02

+0.59

Drawdowns

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHUMX drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHUMX and BEARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHUMXBEARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-95.75%

+66.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-19.52%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.48%

-44.46%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.48%

-52.48%

+23.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-95.75%

+93.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-61.04%

+52.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

10.45%

-6.59%

Volatility

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) at 2.86%. This indicates that FHUMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHUMXBEARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

2.86%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

8.76%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

11.32%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

16.97%

+4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

16.67%

+4.38%

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHUMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHUMX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison

FHUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than BEARX's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
7.42%6.71%0.00%13.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%
FHUMX
Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund
7.64%8.56%0.93%4.41%2.77%4.05%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHUMX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHUMX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to BEARX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHUMX dropped -29.48% vs BEARX's -95.75%.

FHUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHUMX and BEARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer