JNVSX vs. ATGAX
JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNVSX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JNVSX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- -2.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 0.00% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNVSX and ATGAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNVSX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
JNVSX
ATGAX
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNVSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNVSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 58.33 | -57.76 |
Drawdowns
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNVSX drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVSX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNVSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | 0.00% | -34.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.86% | 0.00% | -8.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | 0.00% | -5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.25% | — | — |
Volatility
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNVSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 9.26% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 9.26% | +11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 9.26% | +10.00% |
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNVSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNVSX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
JNVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 11.25% | 11.31% | 6.15% | 0.56% | 2.69% | 22.40% | 1.27% | 5.13% | 6.15% | 4.14% | 1.34% | 17.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNVSX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for JNVSX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer