PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNVMX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Developed International Value Fund Class R6 (JNVMX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JNVMX having a 9.95% return and FHLFX slightly lower at 9.53%.


JNVMX

1D
0.36%
1M
2.49%
YTD
9.95%
6M
13.97%
1Y
32.49%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
10.79%

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JNVMX
JPMorgan Developed International Value Fund Class R6
9.95%48.72%10.03%19.21%-5.10%16.71%-3.88%15.66%-11.10%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JNVMX and FHLFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.93

The correlation between JNVMX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNVMX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNVMX
JNVMX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JNVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
JNVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Developed International Value Fund Class R6 (JNVMX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNVMXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.91

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

7.17

+3.55

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNVMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNVMX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNVMXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.47

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.56

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Drawdowns

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNVMX drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVMX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNVMXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.20%

-33.58%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-11.37%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-13.62%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

-29.36%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-0.42%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-6.11%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.03%

-0.10%

Volatility

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Developed International Value Fund Class R6 (JNVMX) is 4.03%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that JNVMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNVMXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.64%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

12.08%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

14.83%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

15.98%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

17.64%

+0.35%

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNVMX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNVMX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

JNVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNVMX
JPMorgan Developed International Value Fund Class R6
2.76%3.04%4.64%5.27%4.06%5.17%3.14%4.36%4.79%2.63%6.76%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JNVMX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to JNVMX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNVMX dropped -48.20% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

JNVMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNVMX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer