PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUG vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUG vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -45.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's 14.79% return. Over the past 10 years, JNUG has underperformed QQQE with an annualized return of -32.42%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.70% annualized return.


JNUG

1D
-7.15%
1M
-15.90%
6M
-52.25%
YTD
-45.63%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
-32.42%
ALL TIME*
-36.14%

QQQE

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.56%
6M
13.07%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
14.70%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.40M$38.00M$44.93M
$22.33M$22.31M$23.91M

JNUG vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-45.63%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
14.79%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and QQQE is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

0.17

Over the past year, JNUG and QQQE have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

JNUG vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNUG
QQQE

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.0%

Communication Services

-

9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.0%

Energy

-

1.8%

Financial Services

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

-

44.3%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Basic Materials

JNUG
100.0%
QQQE
1.0%

Communication Services

JNUG

-

QQQE
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JNUG

-

QQQE
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

JNUG

-

QQQE
8.0%

Energy

JNUG

-

QQQE
1.8%

Financial Services

JNUG

-

QQQE
1.0%

Healthcare

JNUG

-

QQQE
8.8%

Industrials

JNUG

-

QQQE
10.8%

Real Estate

JNUG

-

QQQE
0.7%

Technology

JNUG

-

QQQE
44.3%

Utilities

JNUG

-

QQQE
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUG vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNUG vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNUGQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.11

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

6.75

-5.08

JNUG vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUGQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-32.14%

-67.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.58%

-9.41%

-61.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.58%

-21.38%

-49.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.67%

-32.14%

-44.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

-32.14%

-67.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.70%

-4.46%

-95.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.93%

-5.14%

-88.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.99%

2.94%

+33.05%

Volatility

JNUG vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 29.49% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.68%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUGQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.49%

3.68%

+25.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.25%

12.96%

+77.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.20%

16.02%

+91.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.38%

20.58%

+61.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.73%

20.76%

+84.97%

JNUG vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUG vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than QQQE's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
2.62%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.58%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNUG and QQQE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (29.49%) compared to QQQE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 10-year performance, QQQE leads with 14.70% vs -32.42% for JNUG. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 14.70% return vs -32.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.58% for QQQE.

JNUG is categorized as Gold, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for JNUG and 0.35% for QQQE.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUG and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer