PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNSTX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund (JNSTX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSTX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's 0.15% return.


JNSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
6M
0.77%
YTD
1.14%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
1.98%

FUMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.29%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNSTX
Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund
1.14%5.89%5.27%4.67%-5.44%-0.09%4.81%4.09%0.90%0.13%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.15%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSTX and FUMBX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.53

The correlation between JNSTX and FUMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNSTX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNSTX
JNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund (JNSTX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNSTXFUMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.28

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.84

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

4.96

+9.37

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSTX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSTX drawdown since its inception was -8.11%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSTX and FUMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNSTXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-8.83%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.37%

-1.54%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.37%

-1.57%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.01%

-8.51%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.81%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-1.84%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.57%

-0.27%

Volatility

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund (JNSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) at 0.53%. This indicates that JNSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNSTXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.53%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

1.62%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70%

2.05%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.22%

2.93%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.78%

2.48%

+0.30%

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSTX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNSTX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

JNSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FUMBX's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.56%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%
JNSTX
Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund
4.48%4.65%4.76%3.12%1.92%1.55%2.05%2.33%2.24%1.61%1.24%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNSTX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNSTX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to FUMBX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSTX dropped -8.11% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

JNSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNSTX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer