PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNSMX vs. MHESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSMX achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than MHESX's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSMX has outperformed MHESX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while MHESX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.41% annualized return.


JNSMX

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.08%
YTD
7.31%
6M
7.83%
1Y
17.75%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
6.85%

MHESX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.76%
YTD
9.63%
6M
11.51%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
7.31%15.72%8.87%11.71%-17.38%7.25%14.46%15.62%-6.57%16.27%
MHESX
MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund
9.63%17.63%0.77%12.54%-26.14%6.62%20.24%20.22%-17.04%21.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSMX and MHESX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between JNSMX and MHESX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNSMX vs. MHESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNSMX
JNSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JNSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MHESX
MHESX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MHESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHESX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MHESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHESX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNSMXMHESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.82

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

10.68

+0.72

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the MHESX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSMX and MHESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNSMXMHESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.24

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.10

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.37

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.22

+0.29

Drawdowns

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.85%, smaller than the maximum MHESX drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSMX and MHESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNSMXMHESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.85%

-46.01%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-8.64%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.60%

-19.47%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-36.05%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

-36.05%

+10.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-11.68%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.26%

-0.66%

Volatility

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) and MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund (MHESX) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNSMXMHESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.19%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

8.76%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

10.89%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.46%

15.18%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.19%

14.83%

-4.64%

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MHESX's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JNSMX vs. MHESX - Dividend Comparison

JNSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, while MHESX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
5.50%5.90%4.28%1.53%2.96%13.36%4.49%5.72%4.86%7.24%1.87%9.16%
MHESX
MH Elite Select Portfolio of Funds Fund
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.20%6.43%4.56%4.72%1.74%0.75%2.41%3.16%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNSMX and MHESX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNSMX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to MHESX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSMX dropped -39.85% vs MHESX's -46.01%.

MHESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNSMX and MHESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer