JNRFX vs. JAFLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX) and Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX).
JNRFX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 3, 1993. JAFLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 13, 1993.
Performance
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNRFX Janus Henderson Research Fund | -10.67% | 18.45% | 35.13% | 43.14% | -29.96% | 20.19% | 32.82% | 35.40% | -2.73% | 25.90% |
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | -0.20% | 7.41% | 1.96% | 5.52% | -13.64% | -0.89% | 10.48% | 9.57% | -1.00% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNRFX achieves a -10.67% return, which is significantly lower than JAFLX's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, JNRFX has outperformed JAFLX with an annualized return of 14.57%, while JAFLX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.09% annualized return.
JNRFX
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- -10.67%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- 15.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
JAFLX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNRFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than JAFLX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNRFX vs. JAFLX — Risk / Return Rank
JNRFX
JAFLX
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX) and Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNRFX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.05 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.57 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 4.90 | -1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNRFX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.05 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.06 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.43 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.04 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNRFX and JAFLX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Dividend Comparison
JNRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than JAFLX's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNRFX Janus Henderson Research Fund | 13.36% | 11.94% | 5.11% | 2.93% | 0.43% | 13.01% | 2.98% | 10.37% | 11.06% | 8.22% | 5.41% | 9.21% |
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | 5.35% | 5.34% | 5.09% | 4.27% | 4.75% | 4.84% | 2.87% | 3.31% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.90% |
Drawdowns
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNRFX drawdown since its inception was -74.74%, which is greater than JAFLX's maximum drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNRFX and JAFLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNRFX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.74% | -18.06% | -56.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.05% | -2.87% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -18.06% | -18.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.48% | -18.06% | -18.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.85% | -1.98% | -11.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -2.12% | -22.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 0.92% | +3.86% |
Volatility
JNRFX vs. JAFLX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) at 1.60%. This indicates that JNRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNRFX | JAFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 1.60% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 2.44% | +10.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.52% | 4.23% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 6.03% | +16.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 4.92% | +16.35% |