JNK vs. XHYE
JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) and XHYE (BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - JNK tracks the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index while XHYE tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JNK returned 8.73%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for XHYE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHYE.
Performance
JNK vs. XHYE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than XHYE's 3.57% return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
XHYE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JNK vs. XHYE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -8.00% |
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF | 3.57% | 6.73% | 7.46% | 11.49% | -1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and XHYE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JNK and XHYE has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
JNK vs. XHYE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
XHYE
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
JNK
XHYE
Energy
JNK
XHYE
Basic Materials
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Communication Services
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Financial Services
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Healthcare
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Industrials
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Real Estate
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Utilities
JNK
-
XHYE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. XHYE — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
XHYE
JNK vs. XHYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNK | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.69 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 8.50 | -5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 26.98 | -14.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNK | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 3.18 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
JNK vs. XHYE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than XHYE's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and XHYE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -8.87% | -29.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -1.21% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -6.40% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.36% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -1.42% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.38% | +0.19% |
Volatility
JNK vs. XHYE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) at 0.56%. This indicates that JNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 0.56% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 1.98% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 3.24% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 7.60% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 7.60% | +0.71% |
JNK vs. XHYE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XHYE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. XHYE - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than XHYE's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.61% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF | 5.79% | 6.55% | 7.04% | 6.46% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and XHYE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JNK has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to XHYE (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs XHYE's -8.87%.
On 3-year performance, JNK leads with 8.73% vs 8.50% for XHYE. On fees, XHYE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHYE has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JNK has performed better with a 8.73% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHYE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 5.79% for XHYE.
JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while XHYE tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.35% for XHYE.
XHYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and XHYE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer