PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNK vs. VNLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNK vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than VNLA's 1.43% return.


JNK

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.97%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
5.01%

VNLA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNK vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.51%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
1.43%5.45%6.41%6.09%-0.17%-0.18%3.01%4.43%0.02%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between JNK and VNLA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2016

0.18

Over the past year, JNK and VNLA have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

JNK vs. VNLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNK
VNLA

Technology

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
66.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

33.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JNK
0.0%
VNLA

-

Energy

JNK
0.0%
VNLA
66.7%

Basic Materials

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Communication Services

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Consumer Cyclical

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Consumer Defensive

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Financial Services

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Healthcare

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Industrials

JNK

-

VNLA
33.3%

Real Estate

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Utilities

JNK

-

VNLA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNK vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNK vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKVNLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-12.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

3.58

-2.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

11.15

-8.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.79

57.27

-44.48

JNK vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 7.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNK and VNLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKVNLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

7.55

-5.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

3.66

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

2.10

-1.68

Drawdowns

JNK vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than VNLA's maximum drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and VNLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKVNLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-4.49%

-33.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-0.43%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-0.49%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-1.76%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.02%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-0.23%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.08%

+0.49%

Volatility

JNK vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) at 0.18%. This indicates that JNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKVNLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

0.46%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

0.63%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

1.04%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

1.42%

+6.89%

JNK vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNK vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than VNLA's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.62%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.78%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNK and VNLA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNK has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs VNLA's -4.49%.

On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.79% vs 3.68% for JNK. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.79% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 4.78% for VNLA.

JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VNLA is Ultrashort Bond. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while VNLA tracks FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.23% for VNLA.

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNK and VNLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer