JNK vs. HYHG
JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - JNK tracks the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 4.97%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for HYHG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
JNK vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 4.97%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.12% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
JNK vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.03% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -1.71% | 5.75% | 0.16% | 12.02% | -1.95% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and HYHG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between JNK and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JNK vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
HYHG
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
JNK
HYHG
-
Energy
JNK
HYHG
-
Basic Materials
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Communication Services
JNK
-
HYHG
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Financial Services
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Healthcare
JNK
-
HYHG
Industrials
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Real Estate
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Utilities
JNK
-
HYHG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
HYHG
JNK vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNK | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.74 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 12.28 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNK | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.36 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.67 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
JNK vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than HYHG's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -25.71% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -2.02% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -7.47% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -9.21% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -25.71% | +2.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.32% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.04% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.61% | -0.04% |
Volatility
JNK vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.14%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.42% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 4.30% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 5.56% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 8.16% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 9.15% | -0.84% |
JNK vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, less than HYHG's 6.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.61% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and HYHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JNK (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 10-year performance, HYHG leads with 6.12% vs 4.97% for JNK. On fees, JNK is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JNK is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 6.61% for JNK.
JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.50% for HYHG.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer