PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNK vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNK vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JNK having a 1.67% return and BBHY slightly higher at 1.73%.


JNK

1D
0.16%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.10%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
4.97%

BBHY

1D
0.15%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNK vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.67%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.73%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JNK and BBHY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.88

The correlation between JNK and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.88 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JNK vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNK
BBHY

Technology

0.0%
4.0%

Energy

0.0%
5.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Financial Services

-

4.1%

Healthcare

-

5.4%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

JNK
0.0%
BBHY
4.0%

Energy

JNK
0.0%
BBHY
5.2%

Basic Materials

JNK

-

BBHY
3.2%

Communication Services

JNK

-

BBHY
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JNK

-

BBHY
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

JNK

-

BBHY
2.5%

Financial Services

JNK

-

BBHY
4.1%

Healthcare

JNK

-

BBHY
5.4%

Industrials

JNK

-

BBHY
8.4%

Real Estate

JNK

-

BBHY
3.9%

Utilities

JNK

-

BBHY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNK vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNK vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.00

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

13.50

-0.84

JNK vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNK and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.97

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.64

-0.22

Drawdowns

JNK vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than BBHY's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-24.98%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-2.37%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-5.00%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-15.32%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.14%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-2.37%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.53%

+0.04%

Volatility

JNK vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) have volatilities of 1.14% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.13%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.85%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

3.62%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

7.26%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

7.53%

+0.78%

JNK vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNK vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.94%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.61%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JNK and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNK has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to BBHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.12% vs 3.72% for JNK. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 6.61% for JNK.

JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.15% for BBHY.

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNK and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer