JNJ vs. PANW
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) and PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while PANW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 10.46%/yr vs 29.12%/yr for PANW. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JNJ vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 51.80% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 10.46%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 29.12% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 57.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
PANW
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 51.80%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 33.77%
- 5Y*
- 35.61%
- 10Y*
- 29.12%
JNJ vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.68% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 51.80% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 56.66% | 53.68% | 22.78% | 29.95% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and PANW is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012 | 0.10 |
The correlation between JNJ and PANW shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JNJ:
$588.98B
PANW:
$208.04B
JNJ:
$8.65
PANW:
$1.17
JNJ:
27.85
PANW:
238.46
JNJ:
0.93
PANW:
0.02
JNJ:
6.08
PANW:
18.95
JNJ:
7.25
PANW:
7.52
JNJ:
$96.36B
PANW:
$10.61B
JNJ:
$66.60B
PANW:
$7.63B
JNJ:
$31.62B
PANW:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
PANW
JNJ vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNJ | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.21 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 1.16 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 2.62 | +12.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and PANW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -47.98% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -36.01% | +25.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -36.01% | +20.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -36.01% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -47.98% | +20.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -6.94% | +4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -14.68% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 15.87% | -12.15% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 5.47%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 16.97% | -11.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 32.33% | -20.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 38.96% | -22.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 41.72% | -24.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 38.62% | -20.14% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.18% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
JNJ vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JNJ vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and PANW have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PANW has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs PANW's -47.98%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and PANW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer