PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNJ vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.


JNJ

1D
1.07%
1M
5.14%
YTD
17.68%
6M
15.11%
1Y
57.60%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
10.46%

FCNTX

1D
1.81%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
6.65%
6M
7.93%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
17.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
17.68%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
6.65%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and FCNTX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1980

0.39

The correlation between JNJ and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNJ vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNJFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.26

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

1.86

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

7.80

+7.72

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNJFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.67%

-49.19%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-11.30%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-19.75%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

-32.59%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-32.59%

+5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-2.41%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-8.16%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

2.69%

+1.03%

Volatility

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 5.07%. This indicates that JNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNJFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

5.07%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

11.16%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

14.53%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

19.23%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

19.71%

-1.23%

Dividends

JNJ vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than FCNTX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.38%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.18%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNJ and FCNTX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to FCNTX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNJ and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer