PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (JNHD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNHD.DE achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly lower than XCJD.DE's 19.48% return.


JNHD.DE

1D
-2.37%
1M
-4.29%
6M
9.62%
YTD
17.02%
1Y
44.20%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
18.86%
10Y*

XCJD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
6M
13.22%
YTD
19.48%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JNHD.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
17.02%27.52%23.21%26.09%
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
19.48%10.38%7.06%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JNHD.DE and XCJD.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023

0.79

The correlation between JNHD.DE and XCJD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNHD.DE
JNHD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JNHD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

XCJD.DE
XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (JNHD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNHD.DEXCJD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

2.15

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

4.39

+10.54

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNHD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNHD.DE and XCJD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNHD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.83%, which is greater than XCJD.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNHD.DE and XCJD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNHD.DEXCJD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.83%

-16.48%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.62%

-15.78%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-16.48%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.33%

-2.20%

-4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.10%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

7.73%

-4.78%

Volatility

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (JNHD.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) at 6.04%. This indicates that JNHD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCJD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNHD.DEXCJD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

6.04%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

15.74%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

28.56%

-7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

20.48%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

20.48%

-2.07%

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNHD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XCJD.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JNHD.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Dividend Comparison

JNHD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than XCJD.DE's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JNHD.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
1.55%1.82%1.85%1.72%2.52%1.83%0.78%
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
1.35%1.55%2.21%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNHD.DE and XCJD.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCJD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCJD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JNHD.DE.

JNHD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged), while XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JNHD.DE and 0.15% for XCJD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNHD.DE and XCJD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer