JNGTX vs. FIKGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX).
JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. FIKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -7.02% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | -10.21% |
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 7.52% | 45.43% | 35.88% | 75.75% | -34.81% | 58.07% | 44.21% | 64.45% | -11.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNGTX achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly lower than FIKGX's 7.52% return.
JNGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 20.41%
FIKGX
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 88.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.99%
- 5Y*
- 27.65%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNGTX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKGX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNGTX vs. FIKGX — Risk / Return Rank
JNGTX
FIKGX
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 2.26 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 2.86 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 5.22 | -3.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 19.77 | -13.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.26 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.73 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.85 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNGTX and FIKGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Dividend Comparison
JNGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.43%, more than FIKGX's 6.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.43% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 6.20% | 6.67% | 0.00% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 4.19% | 4.54% | 1.08% | 19.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNGTX drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, which is greater than FIKGX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNGTX and FIKGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.79% | -45.98% | -38.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -17.09% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.46% | -45.98% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -8.55% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -10.00% | -30.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 4.51% | +0.18% |
Volatility
JNGTX vs. FIKGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) is 8.32%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a volatility of 12.80%. This indicates that JNGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 12.80% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 25.66% | -9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.51% | 40.19% | -14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 38.15% | -11.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 38.39% | -13.99% |