PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNEO.L vs. CCHGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Journeo plc (JNEO.L) and Coca Cola HBC AG ADR (CCHGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JNEO.L is traded in GBp, while CCHGY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CCHGY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNEO.L achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly lower than CCHGY's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, JNEO.L has outperformed CCHGY with an annualized return of 23.94%, while CCHGY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.46% annualized return.


JNEO.L

1D
1.18%
1M
4.27%
YTD
-18.57%
6M
-9.52%
1Y
36.15%
3Y*
38.47%
5Y*
30.60%
10Y*
23.94%

CCHGY

1D
1.44%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
15.09%
6M
19.87%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNEO.L
Journeo plc
-18.57%85.51%6.39%92.75%28.37%102.83%-1.85%14.41%2.61%9.52%
CCHGY
Coca Cola HBC AG ADR
15.09%44.02%22.39%22.21%-21.49%10.73%-5.62%14.62%1.16%42.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JNEO.L and CCHGY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2014

0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JNEO.L:

£73.88M

CCHGY:

$20.91B

EPS

JNEO.L:

£0.50

CCHGY:

$4.83

PE Ratio

JNEO.L:

8.59

CCHGY:

11.90

PEG Ratio

JNEO.L:

0.15

CCHGY:

0.69

PS Ratio

JNEO.L:

0.71

CCHGY:

0.94

PB Ratio

JNEO.L:

3.22

CCHGY:

5.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

JNEO.L:

£104.58M

CCHGY:

$22.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JNEO.L:

£37.51M

CCHGY:

$8.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

JNEO.L:

£12.90M

CCHGY:

$2.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNEO.L
JNEO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JNEO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNEO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNEO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JNEO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNEO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CCHGY
CCHGY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CCHGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCHGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCHGY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CCHGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCHGY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Journeo plc (JNEO.L) and Coca Cola HBC AG ADR (CCHGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNEO.LCCHGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.72

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

1.47

+0.97

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNEO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the CCHGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNEO.L and CCHGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNEO.LCCHGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.52

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.54

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.54

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.46

-0.31

Drawdowns

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNEO.L drawdown since its inception was -92.08%, which is greater than CCHGY's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNEO.L and CCHGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNEO.LCCHGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.08%

-48.25%

-43.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.30%

-17.91%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.30%

-17.91%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.30%

-47.83%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.00%

-48.25%

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.54%

-9.25%

-11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-11.67%

-37.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.77%

8.70%

+6.07%

Volatility

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Volatility Comparison

Journeo plc (JNEO.L) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Coca Cola HBC AG ADR (CCHGY) at 7.57%. This indicates that JNEO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCHGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNEO.LCCHGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

7.57%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.82%

17.99%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.60%

24.64%

+16.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.70%

26.86%

+13.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.54%

28.87%

+23.67%

Dividends

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Dividend Comparison

JNEO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCHGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCHGY
Coca Cola HBC AG ADR
2.29%2.17%4.70%2.91%3.15%2.23%2.03%8.26%1.17%1.36%1.85%2.00%
JNEO.L
Journeo plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Journeo plc and Coca Cola HBC AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
30.50M
5.94B
(JNEO.L) Total Revenue
(CCHGY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. JNEO.L values in GBp, CCHGY values in USD

JNEO.L vs. CCHGY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Journeo plc and Coca Cola HBC AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
39.4%
36.8%
Portfolio components
JNEO.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Journeo plc reported a gross profit of 12.03M and revenue of 30.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

CCHGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG ADR reported a gross profit of 2.19B and revenue of 5.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

JNEO.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Journeo plc reported an operating income of 3.11M and revenue of 30.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

CCHGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG ADR reported an operating income of 650.05M and revenue of 5.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

JNEO.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Journeo plc reported a net income of 1.92M and revenue of 30.50M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

CCHGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG ADR reported a net income of 466.32M and revenue of 5.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JNEO.L and CCHGY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNEO.L and CCHGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer