PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCHGY vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coca Cola HBC AG ADR (CCHGY) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCHGY achieves a 22.20% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CCHGY has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 16.39%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.47% annualized return.


CCHGY

1D
1.78%
1M
7.24%
YTD
22.20%
6M
21.68%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
31.38%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
16.39%

ABBV

1D
2.07%
1M
8.84%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.29%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
19.80%
10Y*
19.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCHGY
Coca Cola HBC AG ADR
22.20%55.07%20.29%28.64%-29.84%9.69%-2.77%19.15%-4.50%56.29%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
4.43%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CCHGY and ABBV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCHGY:

$22.43B

ABBV:

$416.46B

EPS

CCHGY:

€4.83

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

CCHGY:

11.22

ABBV:

114.38

PS Ratio

CCHGY:

0.88

ABBV:

6.63

PB Ratio

CCHGY:

5.13

ABBV:

15.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCHGY:

€22.31B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCHGY:

€8.13B

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCHGY:

€2.99B

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCHGY vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCHGY
CCHGY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CCHGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCHGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCHGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CCHGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCHGY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG ADR (CCHGY) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCHGYABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.85

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

4.11

-1.64

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCHGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCHGY and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCHGY drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCHGY and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCHGYABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-45.09%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-17.32%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.69%

-20.74%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.01%

-21.92%

-29.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

-45.09%

-6.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-1.66%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.27%

-10.70%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.41%

7.78%

+1.63%

Volatility

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG ADR (CCHGY) is 5.67%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that CCHGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCHGYABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

9.26%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.00%

19.11%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.35%

25.23%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.12%

23.12%

+6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.23%

25.83%

+4.40%

Dividends

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

CCHGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than ABBV's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.87%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
CCHGY
Coca Cola HBC AG ADR
2.13%2.17%4.70%2.91%3.15%2.23%2.03%8.26%1.17%1.36%1.85%2.00%

Financials

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG ADR and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B202120222023202420252026
5.94B
15.00B
(CCHGY) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CCHGY values in EUR, ABBV values in USD

CCHGY vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coca Cola HBC AG ADR and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
36.8%
83.5%
Portfolio components
CCHGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG ADR reported a gross profit of 2.19B and revenue of 5.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

CCHGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG ADR reported an operating income of 650.05M and revenue of 5.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

CCHGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG ADR reported a net income of 466.32M and revenue of 5.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCHGY and ABBV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to CCHGY (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCHGY dropped -51.91% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCHGY and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer