PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNEMX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNEMX achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 22.43% return.


JNEMX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.66%
6M
5.29%
YTD
10.41%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
8.97%
ALL TIME*
7.19%

FISZX

1D
1.93%
1M
-3.05%
6M
12.36%
YTD
22.43%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JNEMX
JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6
10.41%26.14%1.62%18.11%-19.44%11.92%13.42%11.14%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
22.43%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JNEMX and FISZX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.89

The correlation between JNEMX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNEMX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNEMX
JNEMX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JNEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JNEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNEMXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.67

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

8.91

-2.99

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNEMX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNEMX drawdown since its inception was -34.13%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNEMX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNEMXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.13%

-39.92%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-14.48%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-14.63%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.05%

-39.92%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-7.66%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-12.20%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

4.32%

-1.02%

Volatility

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) is 4.29%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that JNEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNEMXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

8.02%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

20.62%

-6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

22.71%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

18.73%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.73%

-1.74%

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNEMX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNEMX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

JNEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than FISZX's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.57%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNEMX
JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6
6.07%6.71%3.27%2.40%2.88%6.89%1.30%3.65%3.93%1.83%2.03%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNEMX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to JNEMX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNEMX dropped -34.13% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNEMX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer